Table 5 Series of logistic regression models explaining/predicting ‘violence victimisation’
From: Family violence in a sample of treatment-seeking gamblers: the effect of having dependent children
Covariates from individual block sub-models | Covariate category | Any violence victimisation % For covariate category | Model 1 (“Children” covariate only) n = 164 | Model 2 (+ Socio-demographics) n = 162 | Model 3 (+ Socio-demographics + Psycho-social factors) n = 159 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Odds ratio (95% CI) | p-value | Odds ratio (95% CI) | p-value | Odds ratio (95% CI) | p-value | |||
Children aged < 18 years usually living in household by Gender of Gambler | Male, no children (n = 65) | 38.46 | 1 (reference) | 0.005 | 1 (reference) | 0.002 | 1 (reference) | 0.005 |
Female, no children (n = 39) | 41.03 | 1.13 (0.50–2.50) | 1.01 (0.43–2.36) | 0.95 (0.39–2.33) | ||||
Female, with children (n = 31) | 77.42 | 5.49 (2.06–14.60) | 6.77 (2.39–19.22) | 5.97 (2.06–17.34) | ||||
Male, with children (n = 29) | 55.17 | 1.97 (0.81–4.78) | 2.41 (0.92–6.34) | 2.16 (0.78–6.01) | ||||
Socio-demographics (block 1) | ||||||||
Asian | No (n = 133) | 54.89 | – | 1 (reference) | 0.005 | 1 (reference) | 0.02 | |
Yes (n = 29) | 27.59 | – | 0.25 (0.09–0.66) | 0.30 (0.10–0.85) | ||||
Income support | No benefit (n = 99) | 53.54 | – | 1 (reference) | 0.009 | 1 (reference) | 0.01 | |
Support/NZ Super/Student (n = 65) | 43.08 | – | 0.37 (0.18–0.78) | 0.38 (0.17–0.81) | ||||
Psycho-social factors (block 2) | ||||||||
Symptom rating scale—Inadequacy | ≤ 3 (n = 61) | 36.07 | – | – | 1 (reference) | 0.02 | ||
> 3, ≤ 5 (n = 22) | 31.82 | – | – | 0.86 (0.28–2.69) | ||||
> 5, ≤ 8 (n = 39) | 64.10 | – | – | 3.00 (1.17–7.66) | ||||
> 8 (n = 39) | 64.10 | – | – | 2.99 (1.20–7.44) | ||||
Adjusted R-squared | 0.12 | 0.22 | 0.28 | |||||