Skip to main content

Table 6 Summary of students’ perceptions toward the curriculum content and implementers

From: Development, implementation, and evaluation of a multi-addiction prevention program for primary school students in Hong Kong: the B.E.S.T. Teen Program

Item

Primary 5

Primary 6

Mean (SD)

Positive responses (4–6)

Mean (SD)

Positive responses (4–6)

N

%

N

%

Curriculum content

      

1. The objectives of the curriculum are very clear

5.22 (0.97)

350

94.3

5.16 (1.09)

251

92.6

2. The content design of the curriculum is very good

5.03 (1.00)

344

92.7

4.96 (1.17)

243

89.7

3. The activities were carefully arranged

5.10 (0.98)

348

93.8

5.04 (1.18)

248

91.9

4. The classroom atmosphere was very pleasant

5.06 (1.14)

338

91.6

4.94 (1.19)

244

90.0

5. There was much peer interaction amongst the students

5.02 (1.15)

331

89.7

5.04 (1.19)

243

91.0

6. I participated in the class activities actively (including discussions, sharing, games, etc.)

5.13 (1.06)

347

93.5

5.06 (1.21)

243

90.3

7. I was encouraged to do my best

4.88 (1.18)

332

89.7

4.91 (1.22)

246

91.1

8. The learning experience enhanced my interests towards the program

4.96 (1.17)

334

90.5

4.89 (1.21)

240

88.6

9. All in all, I have a very positive evaluation on the program

4.95 (1.16)

334

90.3

4.93 (1.18)

248

91.5

10. On the whole, I like this program very much

5.10 (1.11)

335

91.0

4.98 (1.18)

246

91.1

Implementers

      

1. The implementer(s) had a good mastery of the program

5.31 (0.94)

354

95.4

5.25 (1.10)

256

94.5

2. The implementer(s) was (were) well prepared for the lessons

5.37 (0.95)

354

95.4

5.30 (1.07)

257

95.2

3. The teaching skills of the implementer(s) were good

5.32 (0.93)

356

96.5

5.25 (1.10)

253

94.1

4. The implementer(s) showed good professional attitudes

5.44 (0.90)

361

97.3

5.31 (1.10)

253

94.8

5. The implementer(s) was (were) very involved

5.42 (0.91)

359

96.8

5.32 (1.08)

257

94.8

6. The implementer(s) encouraged students to participate in the activities

5.36 (0.91)

356

96.7

5.29 (1.08)

253

93.7

7. The implementer(s) cared for the students

5.33 (0.96)

355

96.2

5.27 (1.09)

256

94.8

8. The implementer(s) was (were) ready to offer help to students when needed

5.39 (0.95)

355

95.9

5.35 (1.07)

258

95.2

9. The implementer(s) had much interaction with the students

5.29 (1.03)

346

93.8

5.18 (1.12)

254

93.7

10. Overall speaking, I have a very positive evaluation of the implementer(s)

5.37 (0.96)

357

96.5

5.34 (1.08)

258

95.2

  1. All items are rated on a 6-point Likert scale with 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = slightly disagree, 4 = slightly agree, 5 = agree, 6 = strongly agree. Only respondents with positive responses (Options 4–6) are shown in the table